Logo Background RSS

Featured Article

Study: Deepwater Horizon workers were afraid to report safety issues
By Asiri on July 23rd, 2010
var clickExpire = "-1"; - A confidential report on safety conditions aboard the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, conducted about one month before the rig’s explosion, points to widespread fear of reprisal for reporting employee mi...

Most Recent Articles

  • Everyone who has had chickenpox is at risk of developing shingles. It’s caused by the same herpes varicella zoster virus.

    Symptoms

    The first sign of shingles is usually excessively sensitive, tingling or burning skin where the shingles rash subsequently appears. The area is often painful. At the same time, you may experience fever, headache and enlarged lymph nodes.

    After a few days, the characteristic shingles rash appears as a band or patch of red spots on the side of the trunk or face. It usually appears on one side only. The rash develops into fluid-filled blisters that then collapse, forming small ulcers. These dry out and form crusts.

    A common complication of shingles is pain in the area of the rash that persists after it has disappeared, called post-herpetic neuralgia which is more likely to occur the older you are. People with intractable post-herpetic pain often become depressed


    Causes and risk factors

    Shingles is a reactivation of the virus infection that causes chickenpox. After a person has had chickenpox the virus remains in their body, lying dormant or hidden in part of the nervous system.

    For some reason, often many years later, the virus travels back down one of the nerves to the skin, where it causes a rash in the area of skin supplied by that nerve.

    It’s not clear what triggers reactivation of the chickenpox virus but it may be linked to changes in the immune system such as an infection elsewhere in the body, or after physical or emotional shock. Ensuring your immune system is not weakened may help to prevent this occurring.

    Around one in four people will develop shingles in their lifetime, with men and women affected equally. It’s most common in older people, although it can also occur in younger people and those with a weakened immune system.

    The skin blisters that form in shingles are full of the chickenpox virus, which means a person with shingles is infectious. You can catch chickenpox from someone with shingles, if you’ve never had the infection and therefore aren’t immune. But you can’t catch shingles from someone with shingles (or someone with chickenpox).

    Most adults - about 95 per cent - have been exposed to chickenpox and are immune, even though many aren’t aware of it (they may have had only a mild dose of chickenpox when they were young). However, a small number of adults aren’t immune and will be at risk. Also, when the immune system is suppressed (for example, when someone is being treated for cancer), a person can catch chickenpox for a second time.

    Top

    Treatment and recovery

    The shingles virus can be treated with antiviral medication. Painkillers can relieve the pain, while calamine lotion should help to reduce the itching. Anti-viral medical such as aciclovir is increasingly used as it reduces the duration of symptoms and also the risk of post-herpetic neuralgia, it’s important to start taking it as soon as possible. Shingles that affects the eyes requires antiviral therapy and urgent referral to an ophthalmologist.

    If someone with a weakened immune system is exposed to shingles they are usually referred to hospital for possible intravenous antiviral therapy, as they’re at very high risk of complications from chickenpox. They may be offered an injection of immunoglobulin or antiviral antibodies.

    This doesn’t prevent the disease, but may reduce the length and severity of the infection, and the risk of complications. The sooner immunoglobulin is given, the more effective it is likely to be. It must be given within 96 hours to have a significant effect.

    The treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia can involve painkillers, capsaicin cream and, if necessary, specific antidepressants.


    View this Post in: English Chinese(S) Chinese(T) French Arabic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish

  • Several small streams pushed over their banks, and flash floods  were threatening homes near Flagstaff, Arizona.

    Several small streams pushed over their banks, and flash floods were threatening homes near Flagstaff, Arizona.

    - A 12-year-old girl died Tuesday after falling into floodwaters near Flagstaff, Arizona, authorities said.

    Shaelyn Wilson had gone to see runoff from a flash flood around 2 p.m., according to the Coconino Sheriff’s Department. A younger sister ran back to tell the father that Shaelyn had fallen into a wash.

    The family searched the area near where the girl fell and several agencies also took part in the search, according to Kelli Most, administrative specialist with the sheriff’s department.

    The girl was found about a third of a mile from where she went into the water, and her father performed CPR until paramedics arrived. She was pronounced dead at Flagstaff Medical Center.

    A massive wildfire last month made the area susceptible to flooding, said Most. “There’s just no greenery there” to prevent runoff, she said. The blaze charred 15,000 acres.

    Several small streams pushed over their banks, and flash floods were threatening homes, according to CNN affiliate KPHO.


    View this Post in: English Chinese(S) Chinese(T) French Arabic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish

  • BEIJING – Flooding this year has killed 701 people, left 347 missing and caused tens of billions of dollars in damage, the worst toll across the board that China has seen in a decade, a senior Chinese official said Wednesday.

    Three-quarters of China’s provinces have been hit by flooding and 25 rivers have seen record-high water levels, Liu Ning, general secretary of the government’s flood prevention agency, told a news conference.

    Aside from the 701 dead and 347 missing, 645,000 houses were toppled and overall damage totaled 142.2 billion yuan. All the figures, Liu said, were the highest China had seen since 2000.

    With the flood season far from over, this year is shaping up to be one of the most devastating since 1998, which was the worst in 50 years.

    Flooding, particularly along the Yangtze River Basin, has overwhelmed reservoirs, swamped towns and cities, and broken off hillsides causing landslides that have smothered communities.

    Soldiers used bulldozers to plow through debris Tuesday in search of survivors from separate landslides in Sichuan and Shaanxi provinces, while workers in other parts of the country scrambled to drain overflowing reservoirs and pile up sandbags to prevent further flooding, the official Xinhua News Agency reported.

    Three people were killed late Sunday night by landslides in Lingao county in Shaanxi province that also left 17 missing, Xinhua reported. In all, flooding and landslides from rain-soaked hillsides in Shaanxi have killed 37 and left another 97 missing.

    In nearby Sichuan province, rescuers searched for 13 missing people after a landslide hit Xujiaping Village on Tuesday morning, burying homes and blocking roads, Xinhua reported.

    Xinhua and state broadcaster China Central Television reported the Three Gorges Dam was dealing with its highest water levels ever when a flood crest passed the dam Tuesday morning.

    The government cited flood control along the Yangtze as one of the main reasons for the $23 billion dam project that forced the relocation of 1.4 million people.


    View this Post in: English Chinese(S) Chinese(T) French Arabic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish

  • BILLINGS, Mont. – Tens of thousands of gray wolves would be returned to the woods of New England, the mountains of California, the wide open Great Plains and the desert West under a scientific petition filed Tuesday with the federal government.

    The predators were poisoned and trapped to near-extermination in the United States last century, but have since clawed their way back to some of the most remote wilderness in the lower 48 states.

    That recovery was boosted in the 1990s by the reintroduction of 66 wolves in Idaho and Yellowstone National Park. Yet as those first packs have flourished, increased livestock killings and declining big game herds have drawn sharp backlash from ranchers, hunters and officials in the Northern Rockies.

    But biologists with the Arizona-based Center for Biological Diversity want to expand that recovery across the country. A few isolated pockets of wolves, they say, are not enough.

    “If the gray wolf is listed as endangered, it should be recovered in all significant portions of its range, not just fragments,” said Michael Robinson, who authored the petition. Robinson said the animals occupy less than 5 percent of their historic range in the lower 48 states.

    The federal Administrative Procedure Act allows outside parties to petition the government to act when species are in peril. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman Chris Tollefson, whose agency received the petition, said there was no deadline by which the agency must respond to the one filed Tuesday, which was signed by Robinson and another biologist, Noah Greenwald.

    Tollefson also said an internal review was under way to figure out where wolves once lived and where they might be returned.

    “We need to look at what is realistic and where the suitable habitat would be,” Tollefson said.

    The review will be completed by late 2010 or early 2011 and will contain recommendations but no final decision on whether to create new wolf populations, Tollefson said.

    About 6,000 wolves live in the U.S. outside Alaska, with most of those in the Great Lakes and Northern Rockies, with only a few dozen in Arizona and New Mexico. They are listed as endangered except in Alaska, Idaho and Montana.

    In early 2008, a similar petition was lodged by the Natural Resources Defense Council. In its rejection of that petition, the Fish and Wildlife Service said the Great Lakes and Northern Rockies programs had succeeded and any additional recovery efforts would be “discretionary.”

    The Fish and Wildlife Service faces no deadline to respond to such petitions

    Like the Bush administration, the Obama administration has pushed to end federal protections for wolves and return control over the animals to the states.

    But both administrations have been rebuffed in the courts. Federal judges have ruled repeatedly that the government failed to prove existing wolf numbers will ensure the population’s long-term survival.

    Last year, the Interior Department relented to pressure from environmentalists in the Great Lakes. The agency agreed to put wolves back on the endangered list at least temporarily — just months after they had been removed for the second time in recent years.

    Wolves are notorious predators with a hunger for livestock, and experts say they could survive in most of the country if they were allowed.

    Young adult wolves sometimes travel hundreds of miles when looking to establish a new territory. In the last several years, packs have gained a toehold in parts of Oregon and Washington. Others have been spotted in Colorado, Utah and northern New England.

    But with wolves, more than just biology is at play. Politics serves the deciding role in where wolves are allowed, said David Mech, a wolf expert and senior scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey.

    “In the areas where they are not acceptable, they will be killed out — illegally if nothing else, Mech said.

    The Northern Rockies population has stirred the most rancor, largely because of sheep and cattle killings and wolves preying on big game herds that had swelled when the predators were absent.

    Idaho and Montana initiated public wolf hunts last year, and both intend to increase their quotas on the animals this fall. The states want to put a dent in the animal’s population growth rate, which has been as high as 30 percent annually.

    Wyoming, which has about 525 wolves, was blocked in its efforts to start a hunt after federal officials said state law was too hostile to wolves to ensure their survival. That ruling has been challenged in federal court.

    Wyoming House Speaker Colin Simpson said Tuesday it should serve as a warning for other states that are asked to take wolves.

    “Be careful,” Simpson said. “We don’t need more of that in the West.”


    View this Post in: English Chinese(S) Chinese(T) French Arabic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish

  • – The NHL rejected Ilya Kovalchuk’s landmark 17-year, $102 million contract with the New Jersey Devils on Tuesday night after it was deemed to circumvent the league’s salary cap.

    Just one day after Kovalchuk and the Devils came to an agreement on the longest contract in NHL history, the league determined that it was illegal, a person familiar with the issues raised told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the NHL hadn’t made a formal announcement.

    The contract was rejected because years of low salary at the end of the contract were added for the sole purpose of lowering the cap hit. The person added that no side believes Kovalchuk will play the final years of the deal at those terms. The star forward was slated to earn only $550,000 in each of the last five seasons of the contract that was to run through the 2026-27 season, when Kovalchuk would be 44.

    Only hours earlier, Kovalchuk beamed as the Devils held a news conference Tuesday in their home arena to officially announce that he was coming back to the team after a lengthy free-agent courtship. Kovalchuk finished last season with the Devils after being traded by the Atlanta Thrashers, who couldn’t get him signed before he was set to hit the open market.

    Kovalchuk dismissed money as a main factor in his decision to stay with New Jersey. He instead cited long-term security for him and his family and the opportunity to win the Stanley Cup with an organization that boasts three titles in 15 seasons.

    Kovalchuk’s contract would have topped the 15-year deal goalie Rick DiPietro got from the New York Islanders, and two-time NHL MVP Alex Ovechkin’s 13-year pact with Washington.

    Kovalchuk was to earn $6 million each of the next two seasons, $11.5 million for the following five seasons, $10.5 million in the 2017-18 season, $8.5 million for the 2018-19 season, $6.5 million in 2019-20, $3.5 million in 2020-21, $750,000 the following season, and $550,000 for the final five years of the unprecedented deal.

    The Devils would have absorbed an annual salary-cap hit of $6 million — the average amount per season. That number was brought down because of the extended years at low salary at the end.

    Whether he and the Devils can get together on a new deal remains to be seen. The Los Angeles Kings and the Russian KHL were also interested in signing Kovalchuk before he reached agreement with the Devils two weeks into the free agent shopping season.

    Few expected that New Jersey would break from tradition of not handing out long-term contracts that have become popular in the NHL since the lockout ended in 2005 and the salary-cap era began. Now that the Devils did that, their efforts quickly failed.

    Kovalchuk’s time with the Thrashers ended once he rejected a 12-year, $101 million extension with Atlanta. He totaled 41 goals and 44 assists last season when he earned $7.5 million, but posted only 10 goals and 17 assists with the Devils. Kovalchuk had two goals and four assists during New Jersey’s five-game, first-round playoff loss to Philadelphia.


    View this Post in: English Chinese(S) Chinese(T) French Arabic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish

  • Under pressure, the Democrats are cracking. On both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, there is a realization that Nancy Pelosi’s hold on the speakership is in true jeopardy; that losing control of the Senate is not out of the question; and that time, once the Democrats’ best friend, is now their mortal enemy. Since January, when Scott Brown won Ted Kennedy’s Massachusetts Senate seat, the President’s party has tried to downplay in public what its pollsters have been saying in private: that Obama’s alienation of independents and white voters, along with the enthusiasm gap between the right and the left, means that Republicans are on a trajectory to pick up massive numbers of House and Senate seats, perhaps even to regain control of Congress.

    Evidence of the pervasiveness of this view: Sunday’s New York Times op-ed page, which featured a series of short essays from leading Democratic and Republican strategists about how Obama could go about staging a political comeback, focused not on November’s midterms but on 2012 - an indication that Washington conventional wisdom has already written off prospects of Democrats sustaining a majority in the legislature. (See 10 health care reform ads.)

    What has kept the easily panicked denizens of Capitol Hill from open revolt until now was a shared confidence that there was still plenty of time to turn things around, and that the White House had a strategy to do just that. (Comment on this story.)

    The two-part scheme was pretty straightforward. First, Democrats planned a number of steps to head off, or at least soften, the anti-Washington, anti-incumbent, anti-Obama sentiment that cost them the Massachusetts seat. Pass health care, and other measures to demonstrate that Democrats could get things done for the middle class; continue to foster those fabled green shoots on the economy, harvesting the positive impact of the massive economic stimulus bill passed early in the Administration; heighten the contrast between the two parties by delivering on Wall Street reform and a campaign-funding law to counteract January’s controversial Supreme Court decision. Use all of those elements to contrast the Democrats’ policies under Obama with the Republicans’ policies under Bush, rather than allow the midterms to be a referendum on the incumbent party. (See portraits of the Tea Party movement.)

    The second strand of the Democrats’ plan was more prosaic and mechanical. Recruit strong candidates for open seats. Leverage the White House and congressional majorities to raise more money than the other side. Make mischief by playing up the divisions between the Tea Party and the more traditional elements of the Republican Party, in part to increase the chances that more extreme, less electable candidates edge out moderates in GOP primary battles. Do extensive opposition research and targeted messaging in the fall to delegitimize Republican candidates in the minds of centrist voters. Coordinate below the radar with labor unions, environmentalists and other allies on get-out-the-vote efforts, focusing on young, nonwhite and first-time voters who came out for Obama in 2008.

    Robert Gibbs’ now-famous acknowledgement on Meet the Press on July 11 that Republicans were in a position to win back control of the House sparked a notable outbreak of hostility between the White House and congressional Democrats for two reasons. First, it forced Pelosi & Co. to recognize that the first part of their plan is failing. Public and private polling suggests that anxiety over the lack of jobs and anger over the big-spending ways of the Administration will trump the merits of the stimulus spending, health care reform and the financial regulation bill in voters’ minds. Neither the economy nor voters’ perceptions are likely to be turned around by Election Day. Congressional Democrats were aware of this hard reality before Gibbs opened his mouth, but having him say it out loud was apparently too much for those on the Hill to bear. (See pictures of Sarah Palin campaigning at a Tea Party rally.)

    Democrats also fear that Gibbs’ admission will impact the flow of donations from corporate interests and lobbyists, who tend to want to bet on the party more likely to win the majority. Open musing about a speaker John Boehner, House Democrats believe, will drive mercenary donors to shift their support to the GOP. The huge fundraising hauls by GOP Senate candidates just reported for the second quarter of the year were not, of course, the result of Gibbs’ statement, but the momentum suggested by those figures could be hypercharged by White House pessimism.

    To be sure, the White House plans to continue to try to impact the national environment by touting its accomplishments, blaming Republicans for stopping other measures, and railing against the Bush legacy. They will also continue to work aggressively on the mechanics of victory, hoping to save their incumbents with their customized, race-by-race tactics. Vice President Joe Biden on ABC News’ This Week crowed about Senate majority leader Harry Reid’s back-from-the-dead strength in his Nevada race, credited largely to Reid’s shaky Republican opponent, who landed her nomination in part because of Democratic shenanigans. Democrats hope to replicate that micro-success to save other seats. (See TIME’s political covers.)

    After days of public intraparty acrimony, a cold peace has been restored, with Democrats all around saying they share the same goals and strategy for November. But if the party’s poll numbers stay bad and it loses big, expect a fundamental difference between the White House and congressional Democrats to emerge in sharp relief after Nov. 2.

    Even if the midterms end the Democrats’ one-party rule, the President may well believe that his accomplishments during his first two years in office were worth it. But it’s a sure bet that the vanquished House Democrats who lose their jobs and their gavels won’t share that assessment.


    View this Post in: English Chinese(S) Chinese(T) French Arabic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish

  • NOWY TARG, Poland – With every step toward the gate, Jerzy Bielecki was certain he would be shot.

    The day was July 21, 1944. Bielecki was walking in broad daylight down a pathway at Auschwitz, wearing a stolen SS uniform with his Jewish sweetheart Cyla Cybulska by his side.

    His knees buckling with fear, he tried to keep a stern bearing on the long stretch of gravel to the sentry post.

    The German guard frowned at his forged pass and eyed the two for a period that seemed like an eternity — then uttered the miraculous words: “Ja, danke” — yes, thank you — and let Jerzy and Cyla out of the death camp and into freedom.


    AP

    It was a common saying among Auschwitz inmates that the only way out was through the crematorium chimneys. These were among the few ever to escape through the side door.

    The 23-year-old Bielecki used his relatively privileged position as a German-speaking Catholic Pole to orchestrate the daring rescue of his Jewish girlfriend who was doomed to die.

    “It was great love,” Bielecki, now 89, recalled in an interview at his home in this small southern town 55 miles (85 kilometers) from Auschwitz.

    “We were making plans that we would get married and would live together forever.”

    Bielecki was 19 when the Germans seized him on the false suspicion he was a resistance fighter, and brought to the camp in April 1940 in the first transport of inmates, all Poles.

    He was given number 243 and was sent to work in warehouses, where occasional access to additional food offered some chance of survival.

    It was two years before the first mass transports of Jews started arriving in 1942. Most of the Jews were taken straight to the gas chambers of neighboring Birkenau, while a few were designated to be forced laborers amid horrific conditions, allowing them to postpone death.

    In September 1943 Bielecki was assigned to a grain storage warehouse. Another inmate was showing him around when suddenly a door opened and a group of girls walked in.

    “It seemed to me that one of them, a pretty dark-haired one, winked at me,” Bielecki said with a broad smile as he recalled the scene. It was Cyla — who had just been assigned to repair grain sacks.

    Their friendship grew into love, as the warehouse offered brief chances for more face-to-face meetings.

    In a report she wrote for the Auschwitz memorial in 1983, Cybulska recalled that during the meetings they told each other their life stories and “every meeting was a truly important event for both of us.”

    Cybulska, her parents, two brothers and a younger sister were rounded up in January 1943 in the Lomza ghetto in northern Poland and taken to Auschwitz-Birkenau. Her parents and sister were immediately killed in the gas chambers, but she and her brothers were sent to work.

    By September, 22-year-old Cybulska was the only one left alive, with inmate number 29558 tattooed on her left forearm.

    As their love blossomed, Bielecki began working on the daring plan for escape.

    From a fellow Polish inmate working at a uniform warehouse he secretly got a complete SS uniform and a pass. Using an eraser and a pencil, he changed the officer’s name in the pass from Rottenfuehrer Helmut Stehler to Steiner just in case the guard knew the real Stehler, and filled it in to say an inmate was being led out of the camp for police interrogation at a nearby station. He secured some food, a razor for himself and a sweater and boots for Cybulska.

    He briefed her on his plan: “Tomorrow an SS-man will come to take you for an interrogation. The SS-man will be me.”

    The next afternoon, Bielecki, dressed in the stolen uniform, came to the laundry barrack where Cybulska had been moved for work duty. Sweating with fear, he demanded the German supervisor release the woman.

    Bielecki led her out of the barrack and onto a long path leading to a side gate guarded by the sleepy SS-man who let them go through.

    The fear of being gunned down remained with him in his first steps of freedom: “I felt pain in my backbone, where I was expecting to be shot,” Bielecki said.

    But when he eventually looked back, the guard was in his booth. They walked on to a road, then into fields where they hid in dense bushes until dark, when they started to march.

    “Marching across fields and woods was very exhausting, especially for me, not used to such intensive walks,” Cybulska said in her report to Auschwitz as quoted in a Polish-language book Bielecki has written, “He Who Saves One Life …”

    “Far from any settlements, we had to cross rivers,” she wrote. “When water was high … Jurek carried me to the other side.”

    At one point she was too tired to walk and asked him to leave her.

    “Jurek did not want to hear that and kept repeating: ‘we fled together and will walk on together,’” she reported, referring to Jerzy by his Polish diminutive.

    For nine nights they moved under the cover of darkness toward Bielecki’s uncle’s home in a village not far from Krakow.

    His mother, who was living at the house, was overjoyed to see him alive, though wasted-away after four years at Auschwitz. A devout Catholic, however, she was dead-set against him marrying a Jewish girl.

    “How will you live? How will you raise your children?” Bielecki recalls her asking.

    To keep her away from possible Nazi patrols, Cybulska was hidden on a nearby farm. Bielecki decided to go into hiding in Krakow — a fateful choice they believed would improve their chances of avoiding capture by the Nazis. The couple spent their last night together under a pear tree in an orchard, saying their goodbyes and making plans to meet right after the war.

    After the Soviet army rolled through Krakow in January 1945, Bielecki left the city where he had been hiding from Nazi pursuit and walked 25-miles (40-kilometers) along snow-covered roads to meet Cybulska at the farmhouse.

    But he was four days too late.

    Cybulska, not aware that the area where she had been hiding had been liberated three weeks before Krakow, gave up waiting for him, concluding her “Juracek” either was dead or had abandoned their plans.

    She got on a train to Warsaw, planning to find an uncle in the United States. On the train she met a Jewish man, David Zacharowitz, and the two began a relationship and eventually married. They headed to Sweden, then to Cybulska’s uncle in New York, who helped them start a jewelry business. Zacharowitz died in 1975.

    In Poland, Bielecki eventually started a family of his own and worked as the director of a school for car mechanics. He had no news of Cybulska and had no way of finding her.

    In her report Cybulska said that she was haunted in the years after she left Poland by a wish to see her hometown and to find Jurek, if he was alive.

    Sheer chance made her wish come true.

    While talking to her Polish cleaning woman in 1982, Cybulska related her Auschwitz escape story.

    The woman was stunned.

    “I know the story, I saw a man on Polish TV saying he had led his Jewish girlfriend out of Auschwitz,” the cleaning lady told Cybulska, according to Bielecki.

    She tracked down his phone number and one early morning in May 1983 the telephone rang in Bielecki’s apartment in Nowy Targ.

    “I heard someone laughing — or crying — on the phone and then a female voice said “Juracku, this is me, your little Cyla,” Bielecki recalls.

    A few weeks later they met at Krakow airport. He brought 39 red roses, one for each year they spent apart. She visited him in Poland many times, and they jointly visited the Auschwitz memorial, the farmer family that hid her and many other places, staying together in hotels.

    “The love started to come back,” Bielecki said.

    “Cyla was telling me: leave your wife, come with me to America,” he recalls. “She cried a lot when I told her: Look, I have such fine children, I have a son, how could I do that?”

    She returned to New York and wrote to him: “Jurek I will not come again,” Bielecki recalled.

    They never met again and she did not reply to his letters.

    Cybulska died a few years later in New York in 2002.

    In 1985, the Yad Vashem Institute in Jerusalem awarded Bielecki the Righteous Among the Nations title for saving Cybulska. The institute’s website account of the escape and its aftermath is consistent with Bielecki’s account to The Associated Press.

    “I was very much in love with Cyla, very much,” Bielecki said. “Sometimes I cried after the war, that she was not with me. I dreamed of her at night and woke up crying.”

    “Fate decided for us, but I would do the same again.”


    View this Post in: English Chinese(S) Chinese(T) French Arabic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish

  • SEATTLE – Apple Inc. blew past expectations with its latest quarterly report on Tuesday, selling almost as many of its new iPad tablets as it sold Mac computers.

    Apple also gave higher revenue guidance than Wall Street was expecting, something the company rarely does. Investors sent shares up in after-hours trading.

    Apple said net income rose 78 percent to $3.25 billion, or $3.51 per share, from $1.8 billion, or $2.01 per share a year ago.

    Revenue for the April-to-June period rose 61 percent from last year to $15.7 billion, making it the company’s highest quarterly revenue ever, even beating the latest holiday season.

    That’s better than Wall Street predicted. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters had forecast net income of $3.11 per share on $14.7 billion in revenue.

    Apple sold 8.4 million iPhones, up 61 percent from last year, even though the company stopped shipping more of the previous-generation iPhones after the updated model, the iPhone 4, was announced in early June. Apple sold 1.7 million of the newest iPhone 4 during the last three days of the quarter.

    Apple also said it sold about 3.3 million iPads in the gadget’s first three months on the market.

    Both the iPad and iPhone 4 have been out of stock in most stores and take a few weeks to ship to new buyers. During the conference call, an analyst asked whether Apple intentionally makes too few of the gadgets.

    “We do not purposefully create a shortage for buzz,” said Apple Chief Operating Officer Tim Cook. “We are currently still selling both of those products as fast as we can make them.”

    Cook said he doesn’t know when Apple will have enough of the gadgets on hand to meet demand.

    Some analysts had worried that the release of the iPad, which can be used to surf the Web, check e-mail, watch movies and read books among other tasks, would lure people who might otherwise buy a Macintosh computer.

    The fear seems to have been unfounded: Mac unit sales jumped 33 percent to 3.5 million, helped by what CFO Peter Oppenheimer called record sales to educational institutions in the quarter.

    Cook said it was too early to tell whether the iPad may steal revenue from other product categories in the future.

    Apple’s guidance consistently comes in lower than Wall Street estimates, so it’s notable that Apple said it expects $18 billion in revenue for the current quarter, compared with the Street forecast for $17 million.

    Rajesh Ghai of ThinkEquity LLC said the unexpectedly high outlook appears to be an attempt to redirect investors’ attention away from “antennagate” — a problem with the iPhone 4’s antenna design that prompted Apple to promise free cases through September — and back to consumers’ seemingly insatiable demand for iPhones and iPads.

    Apple shares rose $7.36, or 2.9 percent, to $259.25 in extended trading after the release of the results.

    The company said it will wait until the October-through-December quarter to recognize about $175 million in revenue to account for the free cases it plans to ship to buyers after the end of the current quarter.

    The company did not say how much the case giveaway will cost.

    Apple expects to earn $3.44 per share for the current quarter, less than the $3.83 analysts are predicting.

    While several technology companies, including Intel Corp. and IBM Corp., saw revenue hurt in the quarter by the effects of a stronger U.S. dollar, Apple didn’t seem to flinch.

    “I’m sure they’re seeing a negative impact, but it just doesn’t matter because they’re selling so much stuff,” said Andy Hargreaves, an analyst for Pacific Crest Securities.

    Apple, based in Cupertino, Calif., sold 9.4 million iPods in the quarter, 8 percent fewer than a year ago


    View this Post in: English Chinese(S) Chinese(T) French Arabic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish

  • LYNWOOD, Calif. – Hitting bottom under Hollywood’s glare, Lindsay Lohan began serving jail time Tuesday for a probation violation that underlined the starlet’s inability to put a 2007 drug case behind her.

    Incongruously — or maybe not given the media frenzy surrounding her personal drama — someone showered the actress and the crowd with a blast of confetti outside the Beverly Hills courthouse as she walked in to surrender with dozens of cameras following her.

    Two weeks after sobbing at her sentencing, Lohan was more composed but nervous Tuesday, fidgeting with her hair in court as she waited to begin serving her time for violating probation. The judge ordered the cameras off for the moment a bailiff handcuffed the 24-year-old and whisked her into a lockup cell.

    Her estranged father, Michael, shouted in court, “We love you, Lindsay!”

    Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Marsha Revel sentenced the “Mean Girls” star to 90 days in jail, three months in rehab and increased scrutiny by probation officials on July 6 after determining the actress violated her probation by missing seven alcohol education classes since December. Sheriff’s officials said Lohan will end up serving only about two weeks behind bars because of jail overcrowding and anticipated credits for good behavior.

    After Tuesday’s brief court hearing, news helicopters chronicled her ride in an unmarked sheriff’s cruiser to a suburban women’s jail about half an hour away. The helicopters surrounded the facility as Lohan entered through a side entrance. Clusters of camera crews awaited Lohan’s arrival inside marked areas surrounded by yellow sheriff’s tape on the grass in front of the county jail, which is located next to a busy freeway in a blue-collar area.

    Lohan will serve significantly longer than the 84 minutes she spent at the same jail in her 2007 case. Revel ordered that the actress cannot be freed on house arrest, electronic monitoring or work release.

    Lohan’s surrender was long anticipated but not without last-minute drama. Last week she moved into a sober living facility founded by famed celebrity attorney Robert Shapiro, who on Friday said he agreed to represent her.

    But by Monday afternoon Shapiro was standing before Revel, announcing he would not be handling it. That prompted widespread speculation about who would represent the actress.

    On Tuesday morning it was Lohan’s longtime attorney, Shawn Chapman Holley, who accompanied the starlet to court and stood beside her. Holley acted like she had never left the case and said afterward she will continue to represent Lohan.

    “She’s scared as anyone would be, but she’s as resolute and she’s doing it,” Holley said after the hearing.

    Lohan was booked into the jail at 10:11 a.m. and sheriff’s department spokesman Steve Whitmore described her as “extremely cooperative.”

    Once there, she traded in her dark denim jeans, gray top, black corset belt and black jacket for a jail jumpsuit. She will now spend much of the next few weeks in an isolation unit that has housed celebrities such as Paris Hilton and Michelle Rodriguez.

    After a pair of high-profile arrests, Lohan pleaded guilty in August 2007 to two misdemeanor counts of being under the influence of cocaine. She also pleaded no contest to two counts of driving with a blood-alcohol level above 0.08 percent and one count of reckless driving.

    She was sentenced to three years of probation but has struggled with the terms, earning a one-year extension in October but still failing to complete her alcohol education program as ordered. Holley said Tuesday she submitted proof that Lohan had finally completed the program.

    Lohan was first arrested after a hit-and-run crash on Memorial Day weekend in 2007. Two months later, she was arrested after commandeering a sport utility vehicle and engaging in a chase that ended in downtown Santa Monica. The incident has spawned a civil case that has been delayed because of Lohan’s jail stint. Revel noted that during both of her arrests, Lohan lied about her involvement and said her recent apology didn’t ring true.

    The incidents proved to be more than just a blip in Lohan’s personal life. The star of films such as “Mean Girls,” “Freaky Friday” and “Herbie Fully Loaded” has seen movie roles evaporate. Her last release, “Labor Pains,” didn’t even get a theatrical release.

    In recent months, she also has sparred publicly with Michael Lohan, who she sometimes calls her “ex-father.” The two arrived separately for Tuesday’s hearing.

    Jail is only the beginning of a period of increased court scrutiny for Lohan, who will now have to report to a probation officer within a day of leaving jail and will have to enter 90 days of rehab.

    The time away is impacting several Lohan projects, including her starring role in a biopic on porn actress Linda Lovelace. It has left her unable to promote her upcoming turn as a gun-toting nun in Robert Rodriguez’s “Machete.”

    It will also silence her on Twitter, the microblogging service where Lohan frequently goes to post updates and defend herself. Her final post — roughly 12 hours before she walked into the Beverly Hills courthouse — made light of her once promising film career and her looming incarceration.

    “The only ‘bookings’ that I’m familiar with are Disney Films, never thought that I’d be ‘booking’ into jail eeeks,” she wrote.


    View this Post in: English Chinese(S) Chinese(T) French Arabic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish

  • NEW YORK (Reuters) – U.S. stocks rose for a second consecutive day on Tuesday, led by gains in shares of Goldman Sachs and strength in beaten-down homebuilders and raw materials companies.

    Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) rose 2.2 percent as buyers materialized after an early selloff on news the investment bank’s quarterly earnings tumbled 82 percent, steeper than forecast.

    “Most stocks opened weaker, so it was a buying opportunity for people willing to take the risk,” said Peter Costa, president at Empire Executions in New York.

    The Dow Jones industrial average (.DJI) rose 75.53 points, or 0.74 percent, to 10,229.96. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (.SPX) gained 12.23 points, or 1.14 percent, to 1,083.48. The Nasdaq Composite Index (.IXIC) added 24.26 points, or 1.10 percent, to 2,222.49.

    Stock could extend gains for a third straight day as futures rose after Apple Inc (AAPL.O) reported results that surpassed Wall Street’s forecasts.

    Shares of Apple, maker of the iPhone and iPad, gained 3.2 percent to $260 in extended-hours trading.

    BUYERS COME IN LATE

    Some market analysts said the late buying during the regular session was driven in part by speculation that the Federal Reserve would take steps to spur lending by eliminating interest paid on excess bank reserves held at the Fed.

    The S&P 500 hit a session low near a key support level of 1,060, the 23.6 percent retracement of the index’s 2010 high-to-low slide.

    Housing starts fell more than expected in June, the government said, but applications for building permits, a measure of future activity, unexpectedly rose.

    “It looks like things have turned around on economic news, which was better than earnings today,” said Andy Fitzpatrick, director of investments at Hinsdale Associates, in Hinsdale Illinois.

    Weyerhaeuser Timber Co (WY.N) shot up 3.9 percent to $15.96 and the Morgan Stanley housing index (.HGX) gained 4.2 percent.

    The materials sector (.GSPM), up 2.9 percent, led gains on the S&P 500, helped by a 2.5 percent jump in copper futures — the largest daily percentage gain in almost a month.

    Despite some indicators signaling a possibly overbought level, investment bank Goldman Sachs’ technical momentum and its moving average convergence divergence point to a near-term rally.

    “Short-term, the stock has a decent shot to move back up to around a $165-$175 potential target,” said Vinny Catalano, investment strategist with Blue Marble Research in New York.

    The S&P energy index (.GSPE) was up 1.9 percent, helping to underpin the market. Crude oil settled up 1.2 percent at $77.44 per barrel.

    REVENUE MISSES ARE PUNISHED

    International Business Machines Corp (IBM.N) fell 2.5 percent to $126.55 a day after reporting quarterly revenues missed estimates as new technology services contracts declined. IBM, the world’s biggest technology services company, was the top drag on the Dow.

    Texas Instruments Inc (TXN.N) also missed revenue expectations due to weaker-than-expected orders from one mobile phone customer, and shares of the chipmaker dropped 3 percent to $24.78.

    In after-hours trading, Internet company Yahoo Inc (YHOO.O) dropped 6.3 percent to $14.25 after net revenue fell short of Wall Street expectations.

    About 8.22 billion shares traded on the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange and Nasdaq during regular hours, below last year’s estimated daily average of 9.65 billion.

    Advancing stocks outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a ratio of more than 4 to 1, while on the Nasdaq, about 12 stocks rose for every five that fell.


    View this Post in: English Chinese(S) Chinese(T) French Arabic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish